In February of this
year there was a masterclass course with the title 'Get Heard, Get
Seen, Get Noticed'. It was in Manchester and being run by Apples and
Snakes ( Arts Council grant for 2012/13 £400,000 ). The advert
stated that it was appropriate for poets at all stages of their
careers, from those who are just starting to seek paid work as well
as established artists who want to get up to speed with the best ways
of maintaining and growing their profile.
It happens that this
sort of course was just what I was looking for as on June 4th
the book contract I won as a result of being joint winner of the
Geoff Stevens' Memorial Prize ( with Julie Maclean ) is due to come
to fruition with the publication of 'The Amen of Knowledge' published
by Indigo Dreams Press.
I have no background in
the publishing or literary world. Leaving the NHS when I did last
year was partly so I could concentrate on writing poetry – a sort
of change of career. This class seemed to show the way to how to get
readings, generate publicity, learn how to read properly in public
etc.
Well, it did and it
didn't. The problem was that it was restricted to a group of poets
who are termed Performance Poets as opposed to Page Poets ( those are
Apples and Snakes words ).
The query then is what
makes a Performance Poet. I go to poetry events and read. I've heard
many examples of poets who, I presume, class themselves as
Performance Poets who are nowhere near as good as, for example, Simon
Armitage at putting on a performance.
Which wouldn't matter as much if the funding bodies didn't have to cut as they have been over the last year or so. It's not the time to be discriminating between different ( if they are different ) types of poets.
Yes, I've noticed and dislike this division. But not as much as I dislike the term 'Spoken Word,' which suggests that the words performed aren't classed as poetry at all!
ReplyDelete